Based on the analysis of the Digital Trends and TechCrunch reviews for the Dyson Zone headphones, and including information from Headphonesty, The Independent, and Stuff, here is the updated comparative table with ratings for attributes & detailed summaries for each review are provided:
| Attribute | Digital Trends | Headphonesty | The Independent | TechCrunch | Stuff |
| Sound Quality | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Noise Cancellation | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| Comfort | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| Build Quality | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Air Purification | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Battery Life (Audio) | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Battery Life (Purifier) | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| Design/Appearance | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Price/Value | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Overall Rating | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
Detailed Summaries:
Digital Trends: The review applauds the innovation in combining air-purification with noise-canceling technology, although it highlights concerns regarding the design and appearance.
Headphonesty: Focuses on the balanced sound, effective noise cancellation, and high build quality, while noting the headphones’ divisive looks and weight.
The Independent: Emphasizes excellent active noise cancellation and sound quality, but flags the heavy weight and high price as negatives.
TechCrunch: Finds the noise canceling decent and the sound quality good, but questions the practicality of the design for everyday use.
Stuff: Praises the audio quality and design innovation, though mentions the high price and weight as downsides.
Source Links:
These reviews provide diverse perspectives on the Dyson Zone headphones, offering insights into their strengths and potential drawbacks.