Based on the analysis of the five reviews for the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4, here’s a comparative table showing ratings for various attributes on a scale of 1 to 5, along with a detailed summary and source links for each review:
Comparative Table
| Attribute | PCMag Review | Android Central Review | Trusted Reviews | Wareable Review | Engadget Review |
| Price | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Design | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Display | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Processor | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Health Features | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Third-Party Apps | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Battery Life | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Detailed Summary & Source Links
- PCMag Review:
- Highlights: Competitively priced, bright display, fast processor, wrist-based health measurements.
- Downside: One-day battery life.
- Android Central Review:
- Highlights: Better price than Galaxy Watch 5, comprehensive health tracking, comfortable band.
- Downside: Finicky gesture navigation, tension between Samsung and Google services.
- Trusted Reviews:
- Highlights: Wear OS at its finest, effective digital bezel, attractive design.
- Downside: Features still pending, no iPhone compatibility, Bixby issues.
- Wareable Review:
- Highlights: Minimalist design, good pricing, feature-packed.
- Downside: No improvement in battery life, no iOS support, limited sports tracking.
- Engadget Review:
- Highlights: Small upgrade in the display, smooth performance, health feature improvements.
- Downside: Significantly reduced battery life.
Source Links.
- PCMag Review Source.
- Android Central Review Source.
- Trusted Reviews Source.
- Wareable Review Source.
- Engadget Review Source
This comparative analysis provides a holistic view of the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 based on different reviews, offering insights into its performance, design, features, and overall value.